<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t make me choose a feed format!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trevorturk.wordpress.com/2008/12/07/dont-make-me-choose-a-feed-format/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trevorturk.wordpress.com/2008/12/07/dont-make-me-choose-a-feed-format/</link>
	<description>A chess-playing machine of the late 18th century, promoted as an automaton but later proved a hoax.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:13:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy O&#039;Conne</title>
		<link>http://trevorturk.wordpress.com/2008/12/07/dont-make-me-choose-a-feed-format/#comment-739</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Timothy O&#039;Conne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 10:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almosteffortless.com/?p=872#comment-739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also agreed. I was actually just thinking about this moments ago in the context of using the link rel=&quot;alternate&quot; tag to do an end-run around exactly this problem. Basically, I concluded that XML 1.0 and RSS 2.0 encoded in UTF8 were the de facto standard and that providing the other alternatives was a waste of everyone&#039;s time. 
 
 
 
I mean, I&#039;m sure there are good reasons to use Atom, but when you&#039;re offering multiple alternatives for this, you&#039;re making more work for yourself and annoying the 90% of people who honestly couldn&#039;t care less what syndication format you use. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also agreed. I was actually just thinking about this moments ago in the context of using the link rel=&quot;alternate&quot; tag to do an end-run around exactly this problem. Basically, I concluded that XML 1.0 and RSS 2.0 encoded in UTF8 were the de facto standard and that providing the other alternatives was a waste of everyone&#039;s time. </p>
<p>I mean, I&#039;m sure there are good reasons to use Atom, but when you&#039;re offering multiple alternatives for this, you&#039;re making more work for yourself and annoying the 90% of people who honestly couldn&#039;t care less what syndication format you use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akhil Bansal</title>
		<link>http://trevorturk.wordpress.com/2008/12/07/dont-make-me-choose-a-feed-format/#comment-738</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Akhil Bansal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 03:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almosteffortless.com/?p=872#comment-738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with it. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

